Clarity · Growth · Results
Fractional Controller for Restoration Companies
- Insurance AR tracking and 13-week cash flow forecasting built around restoration billing cycles
- Job-level profitability reporting that separates mitigation from reconstruction on every claim
- Controller-level oversight without a full-time salary
No contracts. No long-term commitments.
Get a Free Consultation
No commitment. We respond within 1 business day.
Your information is never shared or sold.
What Does a Fractional Controller Do for a Restoration Company?
A fractional controller for restoration companies manages insurance AR tracking, Xactimate billing oversight, job-level cost allocation, multi-phase project accounting, monthly financial close, and cash flow forecasting — giving a growing restoration business the financial reporting it needs to manage the gap between work delivered and payment received.
Restoration is the only trade where the business completes its work and then waits for a third party — an insurance adjuster, a TPA, or a carrier — to decide how much to pay and when. That dynamic creates a financial management challenge unlike any other trade. The work is done. The costs are real. The cash is somewhere between the claim file and the adjuster’s desk. Standard bookkeeping cannot tell you where that money is or when it will arrive.
A fractional controller builds the reporting structure that tracks every open insurance claim as a financial asset — what was billed, what has been approved, what is in dispute, and what the adjuster has not yet responded to. Cash flow forecasts are built on AR aging data, not on invoiced totals, so the owner sees actual expected cash arrival dates rather than optimistic billing figures. At month-end, every financial statement reflects the true financial position of the business — including the gap between work performed and cash received.
When Does a Restoration Company Need a Fractional Controller?
These are the 5 financial signals that indicate a restoration business has grown past what a bookkeeper can manage.
Payroll is due every two weeks but insurance payments arrive every 60 to 120 days
A restoration company that mobilizes on a large water loss is paying crew wages, placing drying equipment, purchasing materials, and coordinating subcontractors from day one. The insurance carrier or TPA managing the claim will not release payment for 60 days at the earliest — and often 90 to 120 days when supplements are involved. That gap is the central financial challenge of the restoration business, and it widens with every new emergency response that arrives before the previous claim is paid. A fractional controller builds a 13-week rolling cash flow forecast tied to AR aging data so the owner sees exactly when each open claim is expected to pay and whether current working capital will cover the weeks between now and those payment dates.
Supplement opportunities are not tracked and the billing goes uncollected
When a restoration crew arrives on a loss and discovers damage beyond the original estimate, or when scope increases during mitigation, a supplement should be prepared and submitted to the adjuster for approval. The additional billing can represent 15 to 30% of the original estimate value on complex losses. Most restoration companies do not have a systematic process for identifying supplement opportunities on every open claim. A fractional controller implements a claim file review process that audits each open Xactimate estimate for missed line items, documents supplement justifications with field evidence, and tracks the submission and approval status of every supplement until it is paid.
Drying equipment is on job sites but equipment billing is incomplete
Industrial dehumidifiers, air movers, and air scrubbers are billed to insurance at Xactimate per-diem rates — the daily rate varies by equipment type and ranges from $15 to $80 per unit per day. When equipment logs do not capture which units are on which job site each day, the per-diem billing is incomplete. A restoration company placing 40 pieces of equipment across 12 active jobs loses significant billable revenue each day that equipment placement is not documented. A fractional controller connects daily equipment logs to the billing process so every unit on every site generates the per-diem revenue it is entitled to.
Mitigation and reconstruction phases are tracked as a single job with combined costs
Mitigation — the emergency response phase including extraction, drying, and demolition of damaged materials — and reconstruction — the rebuild phase including drywall, flooring, painting, and finish work — are two financially distinct operations. Mitigation is typically fast, equipment-intensive, and billed on time-and-materials within days of mobilization. Reconstruction involves multiple subcontractors, longer timelines, draw-based billing, and a different cost structure. When both phases run on the same job number with combined costs, the financial reports cannot show the true margin on each phase — making it impossible to determine whether the business is profitable on its mitigation work, its reconstruction work, or both.
Adjuster payment delays are not forecasted and cash shortfalls arrive without warning
An adjuster who goes silent on a claim for 30 days is not unusual in the restoration industry. When 4 or 5 open claims are in adjuster review simultaneously, the expected cash arrivals for that month do not materialize — and the restoration company discovers the shortfall when invoices come due, not 3 weeks earlier when there was still time to act. A fractional controller tracks the status of every open claim weekly, identifies which claims have gone past their expected payment date, and updates the cash flow forecast to reflect the realistic collection timeline so the owner can take action before a shortfall becomes a crisis.
Fractional Controller Services for Restoration Companies
These are the specific financial services included in a fractional controller engagement for restoration companies.
Insurance AR Tracking and Aging Reporting
Learn More →
13-Week Rolling Cash Flow Forecasting
Learn More →
Xactimate Billing Oversight and Supplement Tracking
Learn More →
Monthly Financial Close
Learn More →
Subcontractor Cost Management and 1099 Oversight
Learn More →
Depreciation Hold-Back Tracking
Learn More →
TPA and Carrier AR Collections Oversight
Learn More →
Job-Level Profitability Reporting by Loss Type
Learn More →
Ready to get financial oversight built for your restoration business?
Financial Challenges Unique to Restoration Companies
Underbilled line items compound across open claims without a systematic file audit
Industry data from restoration billing specialists shows that 15 to 30% of eligible Xactimate line items are routinely missed on claims that are not reviewed against field documentation before submission. Missed line items include items such as contents manipulation, antimicrobial application, material removal by unit count, and equipment decontamination — all legitimate billable activities that are often omitted from the initial estimate because the adjuster's scope sheet did not include them. A fractional controller implements a claim file audit process that compares field activity logs, equipment records, and labor time cards against the Xactimate estimate for each active claim — identifying underbilled items before the file is closed and the opportunity to supplement is lost.
Depreciation hold-back tracking is absent and final payment timing is unknown
Insurance policies that cover replacement cost value (RCV) pay claims in two installments: an initial payment reflecting actual cash value (ACV), and a final depreciation hold-back released when the restoration work is complete and verified by the carrier. On large losses, the depreciation hold-back can represent 20 to 40% of the total claim value. When a restoration company does not systematically track which claims have outstanding depreciation hold-backs, the final payment due dates are unknown, the total value of expected hold-back releases is invisible on the balance sheet, and collections efforts cannot be prioritized by value and timing. A fractional controller maintains a depreciation hold-back ledger by claim and coordinates with project managers to trigger hold-back release documentation at job completion.
TPA billing cycles create 30 to 60 additional days of collection delay beyond direct carrier billing
When an insurance carrier engages a Third Party Administrator to manage claims, the billing and payment cycle lengthens significantly. Direct carrier payments average 45 to 60 days from claim submission. TPA-managed claims frequently extend to 90 to 120 days because each invoice must pass through the TPA's review layer before reaching the carrier's payment queue. A restoration company that does a significant portion of its volume through TPA-managed claims needs separate AR aging buckets for direct carrier and TPA receivables — and a cash flow forecast that accounts for the longer TPA collection timeline rather than treating all insurance AR as equivalent.
How Does a Fractional Controller Engagement Work for a Restoration Company?
01
Financial Baseline Assessment
We review your current chart of accounts, how open claims are tracked in your accounting system, whether mitigation and reconstruction are separated on each job, how equipment costs are allocated, and what the current AR aging report shows. We identify the gap between your total outstanding insurance receivables and the cash flow forecast your business is actually operating from.
02
Insurance AR and Job Costing Structure Setup
We configure your accounting system to track each open claim as an individual financial record with billed amounts, approved amounts, received payments, outstanding supplements, and expected payment dates. Mitigation and reconstruction phases are separated on every job. Equipment costs are assigned to the job sites they served. A 13-week rolling cash flow forecast is built on your AR aging data and updated weekly so payment timing is always visible 90 days out.
03
Monthly Close and Financial Delivery
Each month, we close your books, reconcile insurance AR against payments received, update the supplement tracking log, and deliver financial statements that show job-level margin by loss type, phase-level profitability for mitigation and reconstruction separately, and a current cash flow forecast updated against actual claim payment activity. Depreciation hold-back balances are maintained as a separate asset category so the total expected final payment across all closed jobs is always visible.
04
Ongoing Oversight and Collections Support
We review monthly results with you, flag claims that have exceeded expected payment timelines, provide the financial documentation adjuster escalations require, and update cash flow forecasts when payment delays affect expected cash arrival dates. As claim volume grows and loss types diversify, the reporting structure identifies which types of losses — water, fire, mold, storm — generate the strongest job-level margins so business development decisions are made with financial data, not instinct.
What Size Restoration Company Benefits Most from a Fractional Controller?
Restoration companies generating between $1 million and $8 million in annual revenue benefit most from a fractional controller. At this stage, managing 10 or more simultaneous open claims with varying payment timelines, supplement statuses, and hold-back balances creates financial complexity that exceeds what a bookkeeper can track without a structured insurance AR system.
The ideal fit is a restoration company doing both mitigation and reconstruction work, billing through at least one TPA, and finding that cash flow becomes unpredictable when multiple large claims are in adjuster review at the same time.
You're a fit if:
- Revenue between $1M and $8M with 10 or more active insurance claims at any time
- Cash flow is managed by watching the bank balance rather than a forecast tied to AR aging
- Supplement tracking is informal and underbilled items are discovered only after a claim file closes
Fractional Controller Services for Other Industries
Kaizen CFO Services provides fractional controller services to skilled trade businesses and nonprofits across 11 industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
These are the most common questions restoration company owners ask before engaging a fractional controller.
What does a fractional controller do for a restoration company?
A fractional controller manages insurance AR tracking, Xactimate billing oversight, supplement tracking, multi-phase job costing, depreciation hold-back management, monthly financial close, and 13-week cash flow forecasting for restoration companies. They build the financial reporting structure that shows what every open claim is worth, when each payment is expected, and what the business’s true cash position is — not just what has been invoiced.
What is a supplement and how does a fractional controller help track it?
A supplement is an addition to an original Xactimate estimate submitted to the insurance adjuster when additional scope is discovered, damage is more extensive than initially assessed, or line items were omitted from the original estimate. Supplements can add 15 to 30% to the value of a complex restoration claim. A fractional controller implements a supplement tracking system that identifies supplement opportunities on each open claim, tracks submission dates and adjuster responses, and maintains outstanding supplement balances in the AR aging report until each is approved and paid.
How does a fractional controller help manage the insurance payment gap?
A fractional controller builds a 13-week rolling cash flow forecast that maps expected payment arrivals from each open claim against the business’s known cost obligations — payroll dates, equipment leases, subcontractor payment schedules, and material purchases. The forecast is updated weekly as claim payment statuses change so the owner sees potential cash shortfalls 4 to 6 weeks before they occur, with enough time to accelerate collections efforts on specific claims or adjust spending before the gap becomes a crisis.
How is a fractional controller different from a bookkeeper for a restoration company?
A bookkeeper records insurance payments received, costs paid, and payroll issued. A fractional controller tracks every open claim as a financial asset with a known value and expected payment date, separates mitigation from reconstruction costs on each job, audits Xactimate files for underbilled line items, maintains depreciation hold-back balances, and produces cash flow forecasts that show the real financial position of the business — not just what the bank account shows today.
How much does a fractional controller cost for a restoration company?
A fractional controller engagement for a restoration company typically ranges from $2,500 to $6,000 per month depending on open claim volume, whether both mitigation and reconstruction are tracked, and the complexity of supplement management and TPA billing oversight. A full-time controller hire costs $120,000 to $160,000 per year in salary before benefits — without the restoration industry accounting experience that makes the insurance AR structure, Xactimate billing oversight, and claim-level profitability reporting actually work.
Get a Fractional Controller for Your Restoration Company
Restoration companies that do not audit their Xactimate files for missed line items and unpursued supplements consistently bill 15 to 25% less per claim than the work they performed would support.